The blog of a travelling psychiatrist and football lover. Who happens to be a halfway decent photographer. Takes a cynical view of the world

Archive for the month “September, 2017”

A Week At Brentford. Whats next? Will there be changes soon? Bolton V Brentford predictions.

After the disappointing 1-1 result against an average Reading side, that frankly at the end could have been a defeat, there have been the usual comments this week with little substantial of note.  The result was a fair one frankly. Brentford won the first half and Reading the second. The obligatory defensive error was even more ludicrous than normal, and why Rico Henry felt the need to commit any foul in the area is beyond me. 1K4A4967x

During the game Dean Smith had plenty of opportunities to change things, however he chose not to other than some ineffective substitutions. Bringing on relatively lightweight midfield players was probably not what was needed. The strikers got average service but missed chances again. So we arrive 22nd September with a very real chance that we will be winless entering October, possibly bottom and certainly getting further away from safety with each game. Although Bees fans support their team well and do not consider that we are the second worst team, the reality is that we are. Brentford play good though currently ineffective football and have been beaten by some very mediocre teams. We are not scoring and seem unable to contemplate a Plan B.00000262

Despite these assertions the team have had a high work rate and probably do deserve a few more points. What is for certain is that our aim this season now must be to avoid relegation. Sounds harsh but I believe it to be true. Are there three worse teams than us? Maybe. On paper Bolton , Barnsley and Burton look relegation candidates. I cannot conceive that Sunderland nor Birmingham will get relegated. 00000180

So what is to be done? The Bolton game is a must win game. A draw is simply not good enough as it is difficult to see anything other than a point at best versus a good Derby side on tuesday . Brentford need to be physical and positive, and for once avoid needless errors. I would have no issues with the same starting 11 as last week. I don’t think Yennaris nor McCeachran are the players to do this. Should we lose the knives will be out for Dean Smith, and in my view he should be doing better with the players he has, they should be gelling more and scoring more goals. He should be looking for positive early substitutions if needed or none if not. Players like Shaibu and Archibald should be given 45 minutes to play. Often the fans can determine after 15 minutes how good or bad the system is and they can also guarantee that it will be the 60th minute before changes. The captain also needs to captain and be visible and vocal. The fans need (as they will) to stay behind the team. 00000224

Let us hope that we get three points tomorrow against a team bottom and out of form. An early goal might be what we need and preferably 4-5 so we can relax. I have a feeling we might indeed win tomorrow however that by itself will not magically solve all our problems.

Weather Variations In A Game Of Football At Met Police V Hendon

In short a sunny start followed by rain, lightning , thunder , dark clouds and a lot more in between .

Some proper football photographs later but these give you a flavour.

Councils Wasting Even More Money on Pointless Dog Related Orders as Public Space Protection Orders, or PSPOs. Education is the way forward surely.

The front page of The Times on 6th September contained an article about Canterbury Council planning to introduce PSPO’s that effectively mandated that dog owners must carry at least 2 poo bags. The same day Merton Council issued a consultation document relating to PSPO’s that they plan to introduce that limits the numbers of dogs that walkers can walk to a maximum of four and also incorporates existing penalties for those dog owners who choose not to pick up after their dog. In addition to the usual restrictions surrounding where dogs may or may not go ( as below). 1K4A1235

Lets firstly examine what PSPO’s actually are and represent. Public Space Protection Orders, or PSPOs, came into existence in 2014 under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. Similar to the much-derided anti-social behaviour orders (asbos), PSPOs allow for broad powers to criminalise behaviour that is not normally criminal. But where asbos were directed at individuals, PSPOs are geographically defined, making predefined activities within a mapped area prosecutable.

As an example lets take a look at Dover Council. They introduced a PSPO in 2015.

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) specify an area where activities are taking place that are or may likely be detrimental to the local community’s quality of life. PSPOs impose conditions or restrictions on people using that area.

As of the 27 July 2015 a PSPO in relation to dog control has taken effect across the Dover district and replaced a number of out of date by-laws to create a more comprehensive and consistent approach when dealing with issues such as dog fouling, keeping dogs on leads and excluding dogs from specified areas.

In summary this order:  

  • Excludes dogs from:
    • enclosed children’s play areas 
    • specific beaches at certain times of year
    • specific sporting or recreational facilities
  • Requires dogs to be kept on leads:
    • within specific churchyards and cemeteries
    • specific seafront promenades and seafront gardens
    • specific memorial sites and nature reserves
  • Requires dog owners to remove dog faeces
    • This applies to any land to which is open to air and to which the public have access
  • Requires dog owners to put their dog on a lead when directed to do so by an authorised officer
    • This will apply to any public land where a dog is considered to be out of control or causing alarm and distress

The PSPO will be in place for a period of three years from the commencement date.

This all sounds on the face of it fine and reasonable. However what is immediately obvious is that none of this can effectively be policed for three reasons:

  1. Dog walkers walk their dogs everywhere and not in the same place at prescribed times, meaning that councils will need hundreds if not thousands of wardens ( or whoever will monitor all this) to make this work. Clearly this will not happen and can never be cost effective. Canterbury council have only ever issued 1 notice for dog fouling in the last 4 years. Their website allows online reporting, though again how this might work and what level of proof is needed is not clear.You can report dog fouling online, especially if you are aware of a regular offender at the same time and place.
  2. Dog walkers can claim , if they choose not to carry bags, that they have already used them. So wardens will need to turn into Sherlock Holmes to rifle through bins and other poo repositories to find the alleged bags. Presumably then DNA each specimen to determine the dog. This is clearly ridiculous
  3. Dog walkers might argue, reasonably that there is a large difference between four German shepherds and four miniature poodles.

Councils would do better to provide increasing amounts of bins ( although to be fair, these exist already in Merton). But mostly education is needed for those who choose not to pick up.


As a dog owner I can only surmise it is mostly pure laziness that stops some owners picking up, and sometimes they may simply not see their dog produce its excrement. Education is the way forward. I somehow suspect that none of these councils despite their evangelical outpourings , consulted widely and specifically with dog owners ( and by this I mean normal everyday owners and not Dogs Trust or RSPCA etc).  Some folks need education that looking after a dog is a bit more complex than just walking them. Some non-dog owners might need to understand that they should not approach dogs and start stroking them without at least asking the owner, who will be well aware of the dogs nature.

Sam Sodje. What have you done? Real waste of talent.

Sadly the story of Sam Sodje is now out there . Sam was one of the real favourites at Brentford and a talented centre back .

Now he is charged with laundering the proceeds of a crime with three others. The princely sum of 80,000£.

Many Bees fans will recall his defending, his goals and his occasional catastrophe. But mostly his really strong relationship with Bees fans. He played 100 league and cup games scoring 14 goals and was at Brentford 2004-2006. Brentford sold him to Reading for 350,000£ which actually was the only time any fee was involved in any of his transfers. His last professional football was in 2013 at Portsmouth.

The link to the details are all here

Some Return of Sanity to my football world after Brentford, Rooney and England. A visit to an FA Cup qualifying round game Carshalton 5 Pagham Town 3

Following the debacle that surrounded Brentford in the final day or hours even of the transfer window that saw the club sell 3 of the team that played the previous week to Birmingham ( making a total of 14 new signings for Harry Redknapp), followed by the Rooney drunk driving story, and completed by the frankly dire Malta v England game      ( how exactly is Southgate the best English manager? Who decided this and were they residing in an asylum at the time? Nice guy but zero motivational skills, as demonstrated by his team last friday). Some sanity was needed. And where else to go than non league football and per chance it was FA cup day, the Preliminary round.


The FA cup is as important financially to the smaller non league clubs as it is to the footballing giants with prize money for winners in this round £1925 for the 160 winners. Many clubs at this level have crowds that might be as low as 50-100, so this is serious money.


Carshalton are a great small club playing in the Bostik League South and I usually capture 4-6 games a season. Pagham Town play in a lower league , Southern Combination Premier so were the underdogs. Entrance was 10£ and a programme was 10p. Thats right. Carshalton are experimenting with e-programmes to one’s phone and the cost of the text is 10p. Some are in favour of this and some not. Frankly I like the idea as clubs should not be subsidising programmes, as they do, in the paper format. In theory also the programme should be 100% uptodate. Curiously the only thing missing from the programme were the teams! Just blank pages. Teething issues I guess. IMG_5301

Free parking at the ground, decent burgers and a clubhouse, newly renovated , make a visit to Carshalton a pleasant experience. The football also is good. They play good football under their player/manager Peter Adeniyi. The ground also boasts one of the best non league terraces in UK.


The game itself clearly mattered a lot to Pagham Town who by half time were 2-0 up and with a high work rate thoroughly deserved their lead. Something might have been said at half time in the Carshalton dressing room as within a few minutes the score was 2-2. In the end the fitness and the skill of Carshalton showed as they won the game 5-3.


This was good honest football. No unpleasant chanting. Cheap burgers. Football in the sun. High work rate from both teams and some of the finishing at this level was sublime. There were a few young Carshalton players to keep an eye on here.

A really good day out and with no nonsense either. IMG_5300IMG_5297

Post Navigation

%d bloggers like this: